Repozytorium Theo-logos

Źródła i specyfika XVI-wiecznych dyskusji teologicznych w „kwestii Indii”

    A A A  

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.author Miotk, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned 2024-07-31T06:16:43Z
dc.date.available 2024-07-31T06:16:43Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.citation Studia Teologiczno-Historyczne Śląska Opolskiego, 2006, T. 26, s. 123-149. pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn 83-60244-43-X
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/18584
dc.description.abstract The subject of the treatise refers to theological debates on the so-called “Indian question”, which arose due to Columbus’ discovery travels and the Spanish conquest of the “New World” The author gives a brief description of the attempts to justify the conquest within the mission patronage based on “Alexandrian donation”, as well as some problems connected with setting anthropological, legal and theological status of the Indian population. The justification of the Spanish invasions, which was contained in Requerimiento (1513), gave the Spanish authorities the right to use force towards the Indians who offered resistance. The “Salamanca School” played an important role in reflecting upon the Indian rights and defending their freedom; some theologians and Dominican missionaries, like Antonio Montesiono, Pedro da Cordoba, Bartolome de Las Casas, Francesco de Vitoria, Domingo and Pedro de Soto, were closely connected with that School. The situation of the Indians was, however, predominantly affected by the views of John Mair, Juan Sepulveda and some other theologians, who refused to acknowledge the Indians as full-right-humans, considering them to be slaves, according to Aristotle’s concept of “barbarians” and the so-called “sins against nature”, allegedly committed by the Indians. A renewal of scholastic theology, which took place mainly in Salamanca, made it possible to work out new theological arguments in defense of rationalism, freedom and property with regard to the Indians. It was due to drawing a distinction between the natural and supernatural order. The scholastic thinkers emphasized the autonomy of natural order, which cannot be disturbed by either sin or grace; grace can merely lead to its improvement. Consequently, all people are equal since they can tell the difference between the good and the evil thanks to the natural light of the mind. Thanks to such people as Bartolome de Las Casas and Francesco de Vitoria an ethical aspect of colonizing the Indians found expression. Chiapas Las Casas, later to become bishop, fervently unmasked injustice done to the Indians, and his famous dispute with the royal theologian Juan Sepulveda in Valladolid (1550) provided an opportunity to question all reasons for America’s conquest and reject Aristotle’s philosophical concepts as arguments to legitimize unjust enslavement of the Indians. pl_PL
dc.language.iso pl pl_PL
dc.publisher Uniwersytet Opolski. Redakcja Wydawnictw Wydziału Teologicznego pl_PL
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/ *
dc.subject dyskusje teologiczne w kwestii Indii pl_PL
dc.subject Indie pl_PL
dc.subject dyskusje teologiczne w kwestii Indii w XVI w. pl_PL
dc.subject XVI w. pl_PL
dc.subject dyskusja pl_PL
dc.subject Requerimiento z 1513 r. pl_PL
dc.subject tradycja pl_PL
dc.subject błąd Hostiensisa pl_PL
dc.subject antropologia pl_PL
dc.subject Indianie pl_PL
dc.subject John Mair pl_PL
dc.subject kwestia antropologiczna Indian w ujęciu Johna Maira pl_PL
dc.subject przymus pl_PL
dc.subject teologiczne uzasadnienie stosowania przymusu pl_PL
dc.subject teologia pl_PL
dc.subject porządek naturalny pl_PL
dc.subject porządek nadprzyrodzony pl_PL
dc.subject sprawiedliwość wyrównująca pl_PL
dc.subject sprawiedliwość rozdzielcza pl_PL
dc.subject sprawiedliwość pl_PL
dc.subject wojna sprawiedliwa pl_PL
dc.subject sytuacja prawna Indian pl_PL
dc.subject prawo naturalne pl_PL
dc.subject wojna pl_PL
dc.subject ewangelizacja pl_PL
dc.subject kolonializm pl_PL
dc.subject chrzest pl_PL
dc.subject przymusowy chrzest pl_PL
dc.subject India pl_PL
dc.subject theological discussions on the India question in the 16th century pl_PL
dc.subject theological discussions on the India question pl_PL
dc.subject discussion pl_PL
dc.subject tradition pl_PL
dc.subject Enrico Segusio pl_PL
dc.subject Hostiensis pl_PL
dc.subject anthropology pl_PL
dc.subject anthropological question of the Indians as seen by John Mair pl_PL
dc.subject Indians pl_PL
dc.subject constraint pl_PL
dc.subject theological justification of using constraint pl_PL
dc.subject theology pl_PL
dc.subject natural order pl_PL
dc.subject supernatural order pl_PL
dc.subject compensatory justice pl_PL
dc.subject distributive justice pl_PL
dc.subject justice pl_PL
dc.subject just war pl_PL
dc.subject legal situation of Indians pl_PL
dc.subject natural law pl_PL
dc.subject war pl_PL
dc.subject evangelization pl_PL
dc.subject colonialism pl_PL
dc.subject baptism pl_PL
dc.subject compulsory baptism pl_PL
dc.subject Bartolome de Las Casas pl_PL
dc.subject Juan Gines Sepulveda pl_PL
dc.subject źródła pl_PL
dc.subject sources pl_PL
dc.subject Hostiensis' error pl_PL
dc.title Źródła i specyfika XVI-wiecznych dyskusji teologicznych w „kwestii Indii” pl_PL
dc.title.alternative Sources and specifics of 16th century theological debates about the “Indian question” pl_PL
dc.type Article pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Z tą pozycją powiązane są następujące pliki licencyjne:

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland

Szukaj w Theo-logos


Szukanie zaawansowane

Przeglądaj

Moje konto

Polub nas