MacIntyre’a podważenie gilotyny Hume’a

Sobczyk, Anita Mira

dc.contributor.author	Sobczyk, Anita Mira
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-14T14:24:50Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-14T14:24:50Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.citation	Studia Paradyskie, 2012, t. 22, s. 149-157	pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn	0860-8539
dc.identifier.uri	http://repozytorium.theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/5130
dc.description.abstract	A purpose of the article is showing one of the ways of negation Hume’s guillotine. Hume’s guillotine says: One cannot derive an „ought” from an „is”. This thesis comes from a famous passage in Hume’s Treatise of human nature. Alasdair MacIntyre argues that Hume is not making the strong claim of an unbridgeable gap but rather insisting that the relationship should be explained. This article is presenting his argumentation.	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	pl	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Instytut Filozoficzno-Teologiczny im. Edyty Stein	pl_PL
dc.rights	Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/	*
dc.subject	filozofia	pl_PL
dc.subject	moralność	pl_PL
dc.subject	etyka	pl_PL
dc.subject	morality	pl_PL
dc.subject	ethics	pl_PL
dc.subject	philosophy	pl_PL
dc.subject	David Hume	pl_PL
dc.subject	Alasdair MacIntyre	pl_PL
dc.subject	gilotyna Hume’a	pl_PL
dc.subject	Hume’s guillotine	pl_PL
dc.subject	is-ought problem	pl_PL
dc.subject	oświecenie	pl_PL
dc.subject	Enlightenment	pl_PL
dc.subject	filozofia współczesna	pl_PL
dc.subject	contemporary philosophy	pl_PL
dc.subject	uzasadnianie	pl_PL
dc.subject	justification	pl_PL
dc.subject	uzasadnienie moralności	pl_PL
dc.subject	justification of morality	pl_PL
dc.title	MacIntyre’a podważenie gilotyny Hume’a	pl_PL
dc.title.alternative	MacIntyre’s undermining of Hume’s guillotine	pl_PL
dc.type	Article	pl_PL