Repozytorium Theo-logos

Realizm w filozofii nauki

    A A A  

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.author Kałuszyńska, Elżbieta
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-07T08:36:32Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-07T08:36:32Z
dc.date.issued 2001
dc.identifier.citation Analecta Cracoviensia, 2001, T. 33, s. 71-93. pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn 0209-0864
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/8937
dc.description.abstract Philosophers of science have failed to draw the full conclusions from the criticism of the neopositivist model of scientific enquiry. Realising that science does not fit this model they have agreed that, well, “that’s just too bad for science”. The constructivists, often guided by ideological considerations, have refused to grant it exclusive epistemological status (in comparison to myths, art or literature). The rest try to show its superiority while avoiding the classical conception of truth and replacing it with various surrogates. However, the criticism of that model makes it clear that science not only does not but could not fulfil the conditions set by that model because, being an expression of absolutist conceptions of certainty, it asks it to achieve the impossible. What is more, the conditions are arbitrary. This calls for the only justifiable conclusion - “too bad for the model” Coming to this conclusion is the beginning of a long and difficult process of re-evaluation, the construction of new conceptual schemes, new definitions and new criteria. This is the task the philosopher of science must face. pl_PL
dc.language.iso pl pl_PL
dc.publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Papieskiej Akademii Teologicznej w Krakowie pl_PL
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ *
dc.subject realizm pl_PL
dc.subject filozofia pl_PL
dc.subject filozofia nauki pl_PL
dc.subject badania pl_PL
dc.subject przełamywanie barier pl_PL
dc.subject przekraczanie granic pl_PL
dc.subject metodologia pl_PL
dc.subject zadania filozofii pl_PL
dc.subject świat pl_PL
dc.subject opisywanie świata pl_PL
dc.subject nauka pl_PL
dc.subject nauki ścisłe pl_PL
dc.subject poznanie pl_PL
dc.subject konstruktywizm pl_PL
dc.subject antyrealizm pl_PL
dc.subject relatywizm pl_PL
dc.subject realism pl_PL
dc.subject philosophy pl_PL
dc.subject philosophy of science pl_PL
dc.subject research pl_PL
dc.subject barriers pl_PL
dc.subject bariery pl_PL
dc.subject breaking down barriers pl_PL
dc.subject crossing boundaries pl_PL
dc.subject methodology pl_PL
dc.subject tasks of philosophy pl_PL
dc.subject world pl_PL
dc.subject describing the world pl_PL
dc.subject study pl_PL
dc.subject science pl_PL
dc.subject cognition pl_PL
dc.subject constructivism pl_PL
dc.subject anti-realism pl_PL
dc.subject relativism pl_PL
dc.title Realizm w filozofii nauki pl_PL
dc.title.alternative Realism in Philosophy of Science pl_PL
dc.type Article pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Z tą pozycją powiązane są następujące pliki licencyjne:

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland

Szukaj w Theo-logos


Szukanie zaawansowane

Przeglądaj

Moje konto

Polub nas