Repozytorium Theo-logos

Rola biskupów hiszpańskich w kształtowaniu dogmatu trynitarnego na tle kryzysu ariańskiego

    A A A  

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.author Sordyl, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-20T07:03:20Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-20T07:03:20Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation Veritati et Caritati, 2018, T. 10, s. 401-417. pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn 978-83-64487-10-1
dc.identifier.issn 2354-0311
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.theo-logos.pl/xmlui/handle/123456789/3879
dc.description.abstract Doctrinal matters concerning the Christological and Trinitarian dogma were in the fourth century the centre of Christian theology. Particular theological defnitions concerning the divinity of the Son and seeing the Holy Trinity were included in the statement of belief from Antakya, Nice, Sirmium and Rimini. Theological dispute was focused on the Aryan controversy. Spanish bishops took part in it, as well. The crucial role in the debate was played by out-theological factors, such as ecclesial politics or the emperors’ opinion. Many of them had an infuence on this process. An active role was played by Hosius of Corduba. However he was not able either to compromise the schism of Melitene or bring together Arius and the bishop. Hosius took part as well in synod of Antioch in 325, when the statement of belief vituperating Arianism was formed. In spite of a lot of studies on the Council of Nice, it was impossible to determine real reasons of its calling and proceedings of discussions. Constantine the Great did not understand the signifcation of theological dispute. Crucial for later discussion concerning the Trinity, the notion of coexistence the Father and the Son was criticized because of the lack of this term in the Holy Bible and materialistic associations which it awoke. In 357 Hosius from Corduba signed Arian creed, which was determined by Hilarius of Poitiers as “blasphemy from Sirmium”. It had great infuence on Spanish churches and led to divisions. In 359 western bishops during the synod in Rimini took the Arian attitude as well. Lucifer of Cagliari did not accept it. He was supported by Gregory of Elwira. Gregory in antiarian De fde protected the equality of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Probably Lucifer, Gregory and Philo of Libya were not on the side of Arian. From the theological history point of view, it has turned out that the Arian dispute was one of the most serious doctrine disputes not only in ancient times, but in all history of Christianity. en
dc.language.iso pl pl_PL
dc.publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wyższego Instytutu Teologicznego w Częstochowie pl_PL
dc.rights Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/pl/ *
dc.subject wiara pl_PL
dc.subject protestantyzm pl_PL
dc.subject Trójca Święta pl_PL
dc.subject dogmaty pl_PL
dc.subject arianizm pl_PL
dc.subject wyznanie wiary pl_PL
dc.subject współistotny pl_PL
dc.subject Stanisław Hozjusz pl_PL
dc.subject kardynałowie pl_PL
dc.subject kapłani pl_PL
dc.subject duchowieństwo pl_PL
dc.subject faith en
dc.subject Protestantism en
dc.subject Holy Trinity en
dc.subject dogmas en
dc.subject Arianism en
dc.subject statement of belief en
dc.subject consubstantial en
dc.subject Stanislaw Hosius en
dc.subject cardinals en
dc.subject clergy en
dc.subject priesthood en
dc.title Rola biskupów hiszpańskich w kształtowaniu dogmatu trynitarnego na tle kryzysu ariańskiego pl_PL
dc.title.alternative The Role of Spanish Bishops in the Shaping of Trinitarian Dogma against the Background of Aryan Crisis en
dc.type Article pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Z tą pozycją powiązane są następujące pliki licencyjne:

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Poland

Szukaj w Theo-logos


Szukanie zaawansowane

Przeglądaj

Moje konto

Polub nas